FTSE 100: 6348.82 ▼ -25.39 (-0.40%)

Bolton discusses his future, QE and China stocks

by Gavin Lumsden Feb 23, 2012 at 12:49

Anthony Bolton, manager of the Fidelity China Special Situations investment trust, visited Citywire yesterday afternoon.

You can see the great man himself in this exclusive video interview with David Sandham.

Afterwards Bolton spoke to Citywire journalists on a range of issues, including the trust's poor performance, which saw it lose 38% last year.

Big decision 

Anthony Bolton says he will announce by July whether he will continue to run the Fidelity China Special Situations investment trust beyond next year.

In the video interview, Bolton says: ‘I always said I was going there for a finite length of time; I wasn’t going to end my days in Hong Kong.'

Noting that he had committed to remain at least until April 2013, the 61-year-old who came out of retirement to launch the fund, added: ‘What I hope to do, and I’ll certainly do it before the AGM in July, is indicate whether I’m going to extend that or not.’

He also explains why 2011 was such a ‘very tough year’ and discusses his mistakes as well as the things that he has got right. However, Bolton, who invested £2.5 million in the trust, stresses that he remains ‘completely convinced’ in the investment case for the country.

Watch the video now by using the link above this story.

If you can't watch the video now you can read the transcript in full below.

Introduction:
Anthony Bolton of Fidelity is one of the most famous names in fund management. He became an investment superstar, and with good reason. Over 28 years his Fidelity Special Situations fund achieved annualised growth of 19.5%, far in excess of the 13.5 of the stock market. In 2007 he stepped aside to take up a mentoring role at Fidelity. But Bolton couldn't resist the lure of fund management for long. In 2010 he moved to Hong Kong to launch the Fidelity China Special Situations investment trust. Investors poured £460 million in at launch. But Bolton has found his comeback tough going. After a good start the shared turned down sharply at the end of 2010. They remain below the launch price and lag benchmarks.

David Sandham – Anthony, welcome. What is the share price of the Fidelity China Special Situations investment trust?

Anthony Bolton – It's around 87p.

DS – So that's a little bit up on what it was at the end of the year, but last year was franky a catastrophic year for the trust wasn't it - I think the share price fell by 38% over the calendar year of 2011?

AB – Yeah, it was a very tough year.

DS – What was the reason for it?

AB – Well the main reason is it was a terrible market. You know China's been one of the worst markets last year, obviously all equity markets were bad and China was worse than many.

DS – But you did underperform the MSCI China index?

AB – And then I was going to say, also, I'm geared [the fund has borrowed money to invest more than it raised from investors], which magnifies my underperformance, and I'm in medium and small stocks, which act as high beta [sensitive to market movements], so they went down more than the market.

DS – I think the gearing is at 22% on the fund at the moment?

AB – Yes.

DS – It reached a high of about 30% last year - when the price was falling, when the markets were doing so badly in Autumn last year, did you think of reducing the gearing?

AB – No. The only thing is it got up to 30% and 30% is the limit that the board would accept, so if the markets had gone down even further then I would have had to reduce it. But one of the things I was really keen to do was to... I think one of the worst mistakes is to degear after a period of underperformance because then you miss out on the rebound.

DS – One of the reasons investors are so shocked by the poor performance of the fund last year is that it comes in contrast to what really is a legendary performance over a long period. So expectations were high when you launched the China fund. Is it just that you can't transfer the skills into the Chinese market? Is that it?

AB – First of all, yes, 28 years it was a good long-term record. But I had some pretty tough years in that 28 years. Particularly I remember the beginning of the 1980s and the beginning of the 1990s.

DS – Was it in 1990 that the fund was down 30%?

AB – I don't remember the exact figure, but I had some bad years there. Normally, when the market's been bad the fund's been bad. But I'm still completely convinced by the case in China. I've put a large amount of my money, more money than any other investment I've ever made [into the fund].

DS – How much did you put into the fund?

AB – £2.5 million.

DS – £2.5 million of your own money. Can I ask what that's gone down to now?

AB – Well, you can probably work it out! It's down 17% - I can't do that in my head quickly, but it's less than it was. You know, it's not what I expected. The market was much worse last year. I thought we were in a mid-cycle correction, but what turned out... we've now got a full-blown bear market.

DS – How are you going to fix things?

AB – Well, the first thing to say is that I've done a lot of soul-searching in that period. So should I change? Is there something wrong in my approach, am I wrong about China? But I have to say, rightly or wrongly, I'm as convinced as ever by China. I'm convinced that I'm in the right sort of stocks for the medium term. I'm very much in services, which I think will be the best performing area, and I'm in medium and smaller stocks which I think are the place to be in China if you want to make long-term gains.

DS – You have picked some really bad stocks. There has been, for instance, the China Integrated Energy company, which is one of the companies, the Chinese companies that reversed themselves onto the NASDAQ.

AB – That was a big disappointment, and I bought it because I also bought a fund called the Vision Opportunities fund...

DS – That was an investment trust?

AB – Yes, and I was quite taken in at the time by the people who ran that, and the China Integrated Energy Company was one of their big holdings, and they thought it was the best company they owned in the portfolio.

DS – Their biodiesel all went bad?

AB – It was a mixture. They own biodiesel, they own gas stations, selling petrol, and they were sort of trader in petroleum.

DS – Did you go out to visit the plants?

AB – I didn't. I didn't actually go to see them, and the problem was that one of the hedge funds put a camera outside one of the biodiesel plants and it turned out that it worked when investors were there but as soon as they went it stopped working. I think it's an important thing about China that the bad companies are really bad. There's a huge spectrum of the quality of the companies, and there's maybe even more focus on cross-checking because in that case if I'd done more cross-checking I wouldn't have made that mistake.

DS – So you've improved due diligence since then?

AB – I've improved it.

DS – By putting more people on it or spending more money on it?

AB – It's about how can you cross-check what people are telling us, and taking things less at face value. Not that I ever take things that the management tell me completely at face value, but you have to check things. I've had fingers in prospectuses that are wrong, now in my experience, you can rely on what's in a prospectus.

DS – When you worked in the City, in London, some people called you the 'silent assassin' because of the fear with which company management sometimes regarded you because of the power you had. Is it that in China you're not as connected as that, you're not part of the Chinese elite?

AB – Having influence on the companies you invest in, yes, the West is more developed in that way. But most of the companies in China are controlled, so they're quite different. In the London Stock Exchange, most of the companies are not controlled, there's no big company that own half the company. In China, nearly every company is controlled, either by the state or by a family.

DS – I think you went to Stowe public school in Cambridge, not to Beijing University and the People’s Liberation Amry. Do you feel you really understand Chinese culture?

AB – The whole point of going to Hong Kong, you know the team there are all either mainland Chinese or Hong Kong Chinese and I thought if I could take my long-term experience of stock markets. I think stock market skills, the general skills, are transferrable from place to place. Of course what I didn’t have was the detailed knowledge. I’d invested in China in a small way for four years before I went there. But it was taking them and they are all Mandarin speakers to help me on the languages.

DS – Are you learning Mandarin?

AB – I’m not no. I’m useless at languages! I was somebody who after a year learning Spanish was told to give it up because I might fail the O-level. But it’s no different from when I was running our European fund, in particular in southern Europe, you know I didn’t speak Italian or Spanish or German and I needed translators. That’s how I do it in China.

DS - How did you change your style? I know you took a put option on the Korean market last year and that’s a macro play and very different from the stock picking bottom up approach that you are known for.

AB – Well no I have over time done hedging. I did some big hedging of my UK portfolio in 2007 when I became cautious of the stock market so it’s not completely new.

DS – Let’s mention some stocks that have done well for you. China Unicom, the mobile phone company has done well, and Brilliance, the car manufacturer has done very well. What else do you like at the moment?

AB – One of the things I like is I think the best life insurance company, Ping An.

DS – You have had that since inception.

AB – Yes it’s a company I’ve liked.

DS – They haven’t done very well.

AB – Well they did very well and then they underperformed. They tend to be higher beta than the market, they tend to underperform in the downturn.

DS – Ah well, sorry to go back to the bad ones, what about CN Insure? That was another one that reversed on to the Nasdaq.

AB – No it wasn’t a reversal, it was actually a full American listing. And I sold out of that one. I was quite impressed by the chairman initially. I did some due diligence work that was quite positive on the business but they did, without going into all the details, they did some things that started to worry me about the business and I decided to cut my losses.

DS – Did you add recently Hong Kong higher telecommunications?

AB – Yes I had a holding in PCCW, which is the parent company and they spun off as a separate company in a sort of trust form which allowed them to pay a very high dividend. So you had a stock that was on about an 8% yield, which is quite nice.

DS – Did you have recently China Construction Bank. It’s an interesting choice. Was that a recent addition?

AB – Yes China Construction Bank. I’ve been quite light on the big banks, the four big banks in China but I became more positive on a short-term basis. I still have questions about whether they are good stocks to own for the long term but it seemed to me that if we were going to get a recovery that the banks might perform very well in that recovery. And that’s in fact what we have seen over the last two or three months.

DS – Does that bank have a heavy property loan portfolio?

AB – Not... I mean they all have exposure to property loans, but you shouldn't be too worried about bad debt among the Chinese banks, because... not with the big banks, that's not why I don't like them long term, because these banks are the conduit of policy in China. When the Chinese want to do things like the big infrastructure spend, they made the banks lend to finance that. The government's not going to let these banks go bust or have a bad time, and what they did last time there were bad debts, they actually took them out of the banks' balance sheets and put them into separate vehicles and gave them guarantees.

DS – I'd be tempted by the trust, personally, if I knew you were committed to the fund for longer than until April 2013. I think that's all you've said publicly so far. Would you commit to a longer period with the trust?

AB – I felt... No. I always said I was going there for a finite period of time. I wasn't going to end my days in Hong Kong. But I've tried to be as upfront as possible. I thought at least if I tell people the minimum that I'm going to do then everyone knows where they are. So today, as you know, I'm committed until at least April of 2013. What I hope to do, and what I'll certainly do before the AGM in July, is indicate whether I'm going to extend that.

DS – So you might extend?

AB – Oh yes I might. It's a minimum - it's always at least until.

DS – Some investors will be worried that if you were to announce your retirement, for example, the shares could drop fast.

AB – Everyone knows... I've been as open as I can on that. I've passed over other funds in the past, and the transition has usually been reasonably smooth. And obviously I'm thinking about who in the team is the right one to take over from me when I do stop.

China fears QE in Europe

After the video interview Bolton gave his opinion on China’s recent move to buy up eurozone bonds. He believes the move could be seen as pre-emptive action by the Chinese to safeguard their currency.

‘They were very upset about QE [quantiative easing or electronic 'printing' of money] in America,’ said Bolton. ‘They thought one of the reasons the US did it was to devalue the dollar against the renmimbi. And they are also worried about a sort of QE in Europe.’

Investors should not be duped into thinking China’s actions are altruistic, said Bolton, especially if Europe does intend to carry out a form of QE.

‘China does things because there is an interest for them to do it. So there is very little chance of China bailing out Europe to help the world. There has to be some quid pro quo and something they will get in return.’

Four exciting stocks

Bolton is banking on China's transformation into a largely self-sufficient economy and says smaller and mid-sized companies aimed at the emerging consumer class, which make up 75% of his portfolio, are the key bet.

Bolton plucked these four stocks from his £564 million portfolio which he believes will offer impressive returns. 

3SBio: Diabetes is a big problem in China, Bolton explained, pointing out that in part this is due to the country's population becoming increasingly wealthy and altering its diet from rice-based to meat-based as a result.

3SBio is a US-listed company that profits from making drugs used to counteract the side-effects of kidney dialysis, a treatment offered to patients who are also experiencing kidney problems.

'The number of people being treated is increasing as there is more government finance and this [company] is a leader in the field,' Bolton explained.  'You're paying about 12x [earnings] for something that's growing well in the 20s, which I think is pretty attractive,' the manager added.

Kingdee, the new Sage: 'IT services is an area I'm very excited about,' Bolton said. 'Kingdee is in the business of accounting package software and looks very similar to a company in the UK called Sage,' Bolton said. Bolton first looked at Sage (SGE.L) as manager of the Fidelity UK Special Situations fund years ago when it was a fledgling enterprise.  'It is now a FTSE company, and has been a very good place to be,' he said. One of the things I look for is businesses like those I have invested in the west, but where you can buy them at a much earlier stage in their development.'

Wuxi Pharmatech: Wuxi is a laboratory and clinical trial company that works for large pharmaceuticals. Its clientele is largely international, and it offers its customers cheap but sophisticated scientific trials in China that can help keep margins down.

'Wuxi is a leader in that. The biggest company in that field is US-listed and is at 17x earnings. Wuxi is growing at about 15% - twice that of the leader - and trades at 12x,' Bolton said. 'You can buy faster growth at a cheaper valuation and that's the sort of thing that I really like in China.'

Rexlot: The Chinese love of gambling is well known. '[There's] a welfare lottery, which raises money for welfare causes, and a sports lottery that raises money for sports. The total size of these is about two-thirds the size of Macau [the well known gambling haven], so it's a sizable business,' Bolton said. 'Rexlot is very interesting, on 8x earnings and growing at about 25% per annum. What they are going to introduce soon in China is the ability to gamble on your mobile phone and I think that could make even faster growth.'

For more information on Fidelity China Special Situations view its factsheet.

Add a comment

Comments  (25)

  • Allan Wilson: 

    What a very unimpressive performance.

    I'm shocked.

    14:28 on 23 February 2012

  • charlie 12: 

    Just as well he wasn't given a knighthood for the previous superb work done at Fidelity. A lesson to us all - quit while you're ahead.

    15:11 on 23 February 2012

  • charlie 12: 

    Just as well he wasn't given a knighthood for the previous superb work done at Fidelity. A lesson to us all - quit while you're ahead.

    15:14 on 23 February 2012

  • Artemis Gorgo: 

    Truly shocking!

    The man retires from UK equity management; he is pulled out of retirement to use his name to suck investors into a totally unrelated market; £460m of money is raised on the back of the hype; he performs badly and now he thinks of jumping ship!!!!

    If he does leave next April and the fund is still performing badly Bolton's and Fidelity's reputation are shot in my opinion. He should be saying "I am staying as long as it takes to get it right.

    Shame for Bolton as he was a living legend when managing UK equities.

    Fortunately I did not invest thanks to Citywire

    http://www.citywire.co.uk/money/buy-fidelity-but-not-bolton-for-china/a390534

    Great questioning by David - not overawed by the reputation.

    15:54 on 23 February 2012

  • John Osborne: 

    If only Fidelity had launched this Trust without the sales hype and excessive fees which leave a very unpleasant taste in the mouth, and with a broader mandate . . .

    To me, the question is for whose benefit was this trust launched, Bolton's, Fidelity's or the investors'? Have always been of the opinion it is mostly for the former two for different reasons.

    It is interesting that Hugh Young has avoided most mainland chinese stocks in his funds, but maybe now time for far east recovery, I hope so.

    16:07 on 23 February 2012

  • gravedigger: 

    A lesson that operating in Asia requires a different mindset to understand a different philosophy of life. What works in a developed country with transparent laws, strong property rights and largely believable audits, doesn't apply in China where none of the above are the norm. Even company auditors have problems establishing what is real from the conspiracy of smoke and mirrors which can involve bankers and public officials as part of the deception. What chance has a analyst parachuted into Hong Kong,( not China proper) without the ability or local knowledge to differentiate between the genuine and the fake.

    Mr Bolton's deserved reputation derived from his experience of the jungle he knew. Taking on the challenge of an unknown jungle was brave, but perhaps foolish. Hugo Young of Aberdeen Asset Management, a fund manager with considerably more experience of this particular jungle (China Stocks and Shares) "wouldn't touch them with a barge pole".

    16:14 on 23 February 2012

  • Maverick: 

    Isn't this just a perfect example that not doing what the herd does is probably the right thing in the long run?

    16:30 on 23 February 2012

  • robin canty: 

    way,way too soon to draw any meaningful conclusions about performance

    17:28 on 23 February 2012

  • gggggg hjhjkl;': 

    Give me Aberdeen, Schroder and Henderson any time!!!

    17:40 on 23 February 2012

  • Peter Lawless: 

    Seems like a variation on the 'Peter Principle', where someone is promoted to their own level of incompetence.

    18:02 on 23 February 2012

  • MoneyObserver: 

    "Bolton discusses his future"

    What future ??

    He should have rested on his wallet

    18:25 on 23 February 2012

  • MoneyObserver: 

    Fortunately because Hargreaves went overboard about this Investment Trust I never Invested.

    Hargreaves had never ever recommended an Investment Trust before because they paid no broker commission. This one paid handsomely so we had a HARGREAVES BUY RECOMMENDATION. We need someone to mount a HARGREAVES WATCH to monitor their buy recommendations and their subsequent performance.

    Perhaps Hargreaves should reimburse their followers on this investment - they took a lot of commission on their recommendation.

    18:54 on 23 February 2012

  • MoneyObserver: 

    All of which reminds me of another HARGREAVES BUY recommendation I avoided because of their excessive salivation about the fund. In this instance they went overboard about the 2007 launch ( hence no track record - alarm bells) of PSigma Income Fund to be managed by Dr Bill Mott returning to the industry (more alarm bells). "Bill's outstanding, etc,etc,... " . Nearly 5 years later performance is almost indistiguishable from the sector median, but still the plugs keep coming - why ever can this be ?

    Join the HARGREAVES WATCH.

    20:49 on 23 February 2012

  • Eugen: 

    Hargreaves watch, good point.

    They recommended the Artemis Multiasset fund managed by 'the little one', Littlewood is the name of the manager.

    People do buy this sort of stuff making big mistakes.

    21:44 on 23 February 2012

  • John Osborne: 

    and Fidelity Special Sits is still in their "wealth 150" despite bottom quartile performance most of the time. The manager has learnt the idea, but without any of AB's stock analysis or timing skills. I wonder why that is still there?

    With all this, no wonder people are so cynical about IFAs and the "retail fund industry" in general

    22:01 on 23 February 2012

  • Maverick: 

    It's always got to be someone else's fault, hasn't it?

    Do your own research. I did, and promptly sold my holding in JP Morgan Chinese, which was performing quite well at the time. Turns out I was right.

    Robin Canty - So nearly two years is "way too soon to draw any meaningful conclusions about performance"? Which century are you living in?

    22:12 on 23 February 2012

  • mark knowles: 

    I made a couple of grand on it!

    22:15 on 23 February 2012

  • John Osborne: 

    Eugen,

    I think you are being a bit unfair to Littlewood. He was a brilliant manager at Jupiter and managed their Income fund very successfully for many years before he had a break and showed up at Artemis managing this multi-asset fund.

    He has done reasonably well outperforming for 2 years but seems to have misjudged the effect of QE on bond prices and slipped a bit the last year.

    Who knows the future, we shall see what happens the next year, but shame he did not stay with pure equity fund management.

    22:45 on 23 February 2012

  • Anthony O' Grady: 

    Agree with money observer's comments regarding Hargreaves Lansdown.

    My wife has a SIPP with Hl, and I have to say it is very easy to run, and the website in general is very easy to navigate. However I am always very sceptical with regard to HL fund recommendations, and the much hyped 'wealth 150'.

    23:01 on 23 February 2012

  • Sinic: 

    I agree with Maverick. An investment does well and it is 'how clever I am' , another does badly and its someone else's fault. I do my own research, make my own decisions, and invest through HL because they are an extremely competent execution only broker, not because their 'free advice' is anything special.

    23:35 on 23 February 2012

  • Slofty1: 

    I took a 1K hit on it - stuck with it for a while but cut my losses.

    I will still keep an eye on it to tsee if things start to recover.

    However my money is better elsewhere at the moment

    07:47 on 24 February 2012

  • Franco: 

    Anthony Bolton. Sic transit gloria mundi

    23:25 on 24 February 2012

  • Franco: 

    Hargreaves are by far the biggest UT distributors and a FTSE100 company. And they have grown so big by doing what is good for them, not you. The UT in their 150 list are those selling best, or giving them the biggest commission, not those performing best.

    As regards their gushing recommendations, I have found from experience that they should be avoided at all costs and the stronger the recommendation the more are to be avoided. Look at the low cost Vanguard index trackers they are now listing. They charge more to have them on their website than the company do running them.

    23:55 on 24 February 2012

  • Maverick: 

    Franco - I'm tempted to quote Shelley's "Ozymandias" . . . .

    13:56 on 25 February 2012

  • Anonymous 1: 

    Does anybody know if Bolton still have his own money in this?

    22:46 on 27 February 2012

Please use a browser with javascript enabled in order to post a comment

Mobile | Desktop